OpenAI is facing two existential challenges that its recent acquisitions reveal more clearly than any press release could. The company's purchases of personal finance startup Hiro and new media company TBPN may look like small deals, but according to TechCrunch's Equity podcast, they each address a fundamental threat to OpenAI's future: the struggle to build a sustainable business beyond the chatbot, and a rapidly deteriorating public image.
The Product Problem
OpenAI has a wildly successful product in ChatGPT. But whether it can ever generate enough revenue to justify the largest private funding rounds in history remains an open question. The company raised $122 billion in late March at an $852 billion valuation numbers that require extraordinary revenue growth to justify.
The Hiro acquisition appears to be a bet on solving that problem. Hiro's founder, Ethan Bloch, is a serial entrepreneur with a track record of building consumer apps that people actually pay for. His previous company, Digit, sold for more than $200 million. By bringing Bloch and his team aboard, OpenAI may be looking for someone who can create products with more hooks than just a chatbot something worth paying more for.
The Hiro deal is clearly an acquihire. The product is shutting down, data is being deleted, and the team is moving to OpenAI. But the strategic intent goes beyond simple talent acquisition. OpenAI needs to prove it can build consumer products that generate meaningful revenue, not just impressive user numbers.
The Image Problem
The TBPN acquisition addresses a different weakness entirely. OpenAI's public image has taken significant hits in recent months. A damaging New Yorker profile questioned CEO Sam Altman's trustworthiness. The company's close ties to the Trump administration have alienated some users. The shutdown of Sora and other side projects has made the company appear unfocused. And two senior executives departed in a single day last week.
TBPN is a business talk show that OpenAI acquired reportedly to help shape its public narrative. The show's team has been placed under OpenAI's public policy and communications umbrella, though the company claims editorial independence will be maintained. TechCrunch's Equity hosts expressed healthy skepticism about whether that independence can survive once the show's creators report to OpenAI's comms team.
Anthropic Is the Real Threat
The context behind both acquisitions is Anthropic's rise. The company behind Claude has been growing at a pace that is making OpenAI's investors nervous. Anthropic's annualized revenue hit $30 billion in April, surpassing OpenAI's reported $24-25 billion figure. Around 80 percent of that revenue comes from enterprise customers, producing higher retention and lower churn than OpenAI's consumer-heavy model.
At the HumanX conference earlier this month, TechCrunch reporter Lucas Ropek found that vendor after vendor was talking about Claude Code, while ChatGPT was treated as an afterthought. One vendor described OpenAI as having "gone downhill." That sentiment is no longer fringe it is becoming mainstream among enterprise users.
OpenAI responded by revamping Codex with background agents, an in-app browser, and 111 new plugins. It also launched a $100 Pro plan specifically targeting developers. But whether these moves are enough to recapture enterprise momentum from Anthropic remains the central question.
Two Companies, Two Strategies
The Equity podcast discussion surfaced an interesting question: are OpenAI and Anthropic direct competitors, or are they evolving into fundamentally different companies? OpenAI draws heavily from consumers and is expanding into media, finance, and hardware. Anthropic is laser-focused on enterprise and coding tools, with 80 percent of its revenue coming from business customers.
The hosts concluded that the two companies are absolutely direct competitors but acknowledged that in a large enough market, both could succeed. The question is whether OpenAI can match Anthropic's enterprise momentum while also solving its consumer product and public image challenges simultaneously.
The Bigger Picture
OpenAI's existential problems are not about whether the company will survive it has too much capital and too many users for that. The real question is whether it can justify its valuation, sustain its position as the industry leader, and build a business that eventually generates positive free cash flow. Anthropic projects reaching that milestone by 2027. OpenAI has pushed its target to 2030.
The acquisitions of Hiro and TBPN are small moves in a very large game. But they reveal a company that is acutely aware of its vulnerabilities and willing to buy its way toward solutions. Whether those solutions arrive before Anthropic's lead becomes insurmountable is the question that will define the AI industry's next chapter.
Internal links placed in article:
